Is Phyiscian Assisted Suicide Ethical Essays - Medical Ethics

Is Phyiscian Assisted Suicide Ethical? Physician-Assisted Suicide is Ethical Jack Kevorkian addresses many aspects of physician-assisted suicide. First, he addresses the Hippocratic oath, stating that there is no oath concerning a doctor's moral codes. Next, he addresses the slippery slope argument. Kevorkian states that the only way the slippery slope argument will take place, is if everyone is insecure and cannot control their individual actions. Finally, Kevorkian proves that physicians are no longer the mediators of death. By using the Mercitron, a physician would not be responsible for the death of another human being. Through all of these aspects of euthanasia, Kevorkian explores moral codes within the medical field and within society, proving that there is no set of moral codes labeled as the Hippocratic oath. The Hippocratic oath, according to society, is a set of moral and ethical codes that limit a doctor to doing the right thing. Now, what is the right thing? Each individual has a different set of moral codes. In addition, if each individual has a different set of moral codes, how can each doctor have the same set of moral codes? Kevorkian answers this by saying that he never took a Hippocratic oath after graduating from the University of Michigan. Most doctors have allegedly taken this oath of ethics, yet not one doctor can pinpoint the exact oath. Next, if you ask the doctors who invented the Hippocratic oath, you will get varied replies, most focusing on Hippocrates in ancient Greece. As Kevorkian points out, ?the oath was something occasionally mentioned in medical school but rarely studied in detail.? In short, the Hippocratic oath is almost like a fairytale that professors tell their medical students. The slippery slope argument is a weak man's argument. The reason being, in order for the slippery slope to take effect, people have to lose total control over their decisions and actions. The slippery slope is backed up by a bunch of what if's. If we allow one thing to happen, a chain reaction of events could occur. Kevorkian, however, states that ?the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine concluded that ?much more is needed than merely pointing out that allowing one kind of action could conceivable increase the tendency to allow the unjustified action.'? The Mercitron is a machine that ?provides a lethal intravenous solution to assist people in suicide?. This machine prevents physicians from being the mediators of death. Kevorkian proves that doctors are not needed to commit suicide. Either the patient or the patient's family can give the injection or insert the IV to inject a lethal solution into the patient. Society may think that it is wrong for a doctor to interfere with the suicide of a patient because it is morally wrong. Kevorkian then says that suicide may be wrong for society, or certain individuals, yet for the patient, suicide might be morally right. As Kevorkian states, ?it is wrong for any and all members of society to even try to judge the morality of an individual's action, deemed by that society to be immoral, when the individual concerned disagrees and performs the action in such a manner as not to infringe the autonomy of others or society's official rules of culpability.? Therefore, most likely, a doctor is not hel d responsible for the suicide of an individual. When an individual has made a decision to commit such an act, as suicide, no person should pass judgment on them as long as they do not interfere with the lives of others. In conclusion, Jack Kevorkian has stated three facts. First, that there is no written set of rules known as the Hippocratic oath. Second, that the slippery slope argument has no bearing on the actions of society; it is the individual's actions that influence society. Third, physicians are no longer needed to be mediators of death. When committing suicide, individuals may inject themselves or have a family member inject them with the lethal solution. Jack Kevorkian has proven that each individual has there own set of moral codes that they live by, so doctors must be no exception. Social Issues

Critic On Game Cricket Sample Essay - How Can You Be Better Off?

Critic On Game Cricket Sample Essay - How Can You Be Better Off?You could find a critic on game cricket sample essay very easy. It is always best to work with a person who has a strong knowledge about the sport and is experienced. Sometimes a critic on game cricket sample essay can provide you with the best insights about cricket. As you are working on a piece of research, it will be important to keep in mind that the thing that should be analyzed is not necessarily the writer but the point that they are making.Writing a copy of your essay can be done by a critic. However, there is an actual problem when it comes to judging what you have written. The way that critics analyze the quality of writing is by referring to the meaning of the words and the sense of the writing. In this way, they can judge whether the piece is useful for the purpose that it is supposed to fulfill.There is no real way to judge the quality of writing by a particular writer. However, the biggest help to you will be if a critic on game cricket sample essay can tell you what parts of the essay that are not relevant. If a critic can tell you that the content is not pertinent, then it is not likely that the content that you have written will be informative. There are some people who just criticize things and expect you to know better.It is always better to work with a critic who can judge the quality of writing and the meaning of the words. This helps you improve your writing and at the same time it also allows you to make use of that knowledge in order to improve your writing. You will find it easier to write about the merits of the article if you are able to evaluate the quality of writing. In order to judge the quality of writing you can ask the critic to give you feedback and it can also be done through email. In fact, it is best to do all these things with the help of a professional.The more importance is placed on the topic of the writing, the better it will be to assess the quality of w riting. It is best to ask the writer to come up with a good idea of the subject matter because then you will be able to understand the significance of the information that you will be giving in the copy. If a critic on game cricket sample essay will give you a clear idea of the subject matter, then the quality of the writing will be higher. If you are using a variety of styles in your writing, then you will find it difficult to judge the quality of writing.However, the critic on game cricket sample essay will not only provide you with the quality of writing, but he or she will also tell you how well you are going to carry the information and the ideas in the piece. These kinds of devices are quite useful for beginners in the field of writing and in case you want to get good advice from a critic then it is best to get a copy of their work. At the same time, you should use these devices and analysis of the critic for enhancing your skills in writing and analyzing the skills in the sam e.However, the quality of writing can be judged by the critic on game cricket sample essay only if the writer is well aware of the meaning of the words and it does not reflect the difficulties. However, if the writing is not making any sense, then you can consider looking for a different critic who can help you in your own writing skills.